🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.